LIVE IT LEARN IT BUILD IT SUPPORT IT  
 

New Haven Woodcrafts Etc. homepage link

 
  BUILDING BLOCKS FOR LIFE

An Integrated Comprehensive Program for
Youth in Residential Care

 

The Building Blocks For Life program aligns with key elements of the New Haven Mission and Core Beliefs. New Haven and Its staff believe that all individuals have the:

  • Power to transform and change
  • Ability to form relationships
  • Ability to problem solve
  • Ability to develop a sense of identity
  • Ability to plan and hope

Treatment Philosophy

The Building Blocks For Life Program uses a psycho-educational approach which embraces three harmonious theoretical models as its philosophical foundation. These include:


Assessment & Evidence-Based Treatment Planning

Assessment & Evidence-Based Treatment Planning has several goals:

  • To provide a comprehensive picture of the youth
  • To provide a system of ongoing review of youth treatment progress
  • To establish a Master Treatment Plan (MTP) that defines the long and short term goals for the resident.
  • To move the youth to a less restrictive environment after six months of treatment.
  • To provide ongoing assessment of treatment program effectiveness.
  • To provide information for continuous improvement.

Learn More


Program Description

New Haven’s Basic Program Framework Includes:

  • Therapeutic Milieu with clinically trained oversight
  • Group Therapy
  • Individual Therapy
  • Family Therapy
  • Special Education
  • Vocational Training Program

Learn More


Reeducation

Reeducation uses concepts and procedures derived largely from education, but cast in an ecological framework and informed by the insights of the mental health disciplines. It asserts that no single approach holds all the answers, and thus seeks to bridge various concepts of education and treatment in order to facilitate the best opportunity for creating positive change.

Reeducation believes that constructing a truly powerful learning environment requires a holistic synergistic practice model that harmonizes a wide variety of factors which places the quality of a youth’s total experience at the center. Its tenants include:

  • Relationship is primary
  • Assessment is ecological
  • Behavior is holistic
  • Teaching is humanistic
  • Crisis is opportunity
  • Practice is pragmatic

Back


Reclaiming Youth

Reclaiming Youth, as a concept, was first articulated by Martin Wolins, a sociologist at the University of California, Berkeley. He advocated the creation of “Reclaiming Environments”, which bring changes to meet both the needs of the young person and of society. To reclaim is to recover, redeem, and restore value to something that has been devalued. Characteristics of a reclaiming environment include:

  • Experiencing belonging in a supportive community
  • Meeting one’s need for mastery
  • Involving youth in determining their own future while recognizing society’s need to control harmful behavior
  • Expecting youth to be caregivers, not just passive recipients.

Reclaiming Youth also stands in contrast to the Ecological Hazards of modern society, including:

  • Discouragement and alienation
  • Destructive relationships
  • Climates of futility
  • Learned irresponsibility
  • Loss of Purpose or values

Fostering high self-esteem is the primary goal of reclaiming environments. Children and youth lacking a sense of self-worth are vulnerable to a host of social, psychological, and learning problems. Stanley Coopersmith in his definitive work on self-concept identified four universal components of self-esteem:

  • Sense of Significance/Acceptance by others (Belonging)
  • Sense of Competence/Self-Efficacy (Mastery)
  • Sense of Ability to Control Behavior and Gain Respect (Independence)
  • Sense of Virtue/Worthiness; Spiritual Fulfillment (Generosity)

Back


Resiliency

Resiliency research refers to a body of international cross-cultural, lifespan developmental studies that followed children born into seriously high-risk conditions such as families where parents were mentally ill, alcoholic, abusive, or criminal, or in communities that were poverty-stricken or war-torn. The astounding finding from these long term studies was that at least 50% -- and often closer to 70% -- of youth growing up in these high-risk conditions did develop social competence despite exposure to severe stress and did overcome the odds to lead successful lives. These studies identified:

  • The characteristics of the resilient youth
  • The qualities of community systems and supports
  • The family environment
  • The school or educational setting, practices, and climate

Hence, the more risk factors that can be reduced and the more protective factors we can increase, the greater the likelihood that the young person will be resilient and weather the impact of severe stress and lead productive lives.

Back


Assessment & Evidence-Based Treatment Planning

Assessment and Evidence-Based Treatment Planning has two primary goals.

  • First, it provides a comprehensive picture of the youth, with hard data with which to develop a treatment plan.
  • It also is a system of ongoing review of treatment progress and a method of critically examining the effectiveness of what we do.

Over time, the data collected demonstrates just how effective our program is in achieving our mission.

Evidence-Based Treatment Planning consists of two parts

  • Assessment
  • Face-to-Face Consultation

Within the first two weeks after placement, four assessments are conducted, as follows:

  • Academic KTEA II or other tool
  • Clinical Child Adolescent Functional Assessment Survey Vocational
  • Ansell-Casey Life Skills
  • Residential Behavioral Assessment Form (BASC)

This data is brought to the Master Treatment Plan Meeting, at which time the assessment data is shared, discussed and the Master Treatment Plan (MTP) is drafted, outlining the long and short term goals for the resident. The fundamental goal of the team is to move the youth to a less restrictive environment after six months of treatment.

After the Master Treatment Plan, the Treatment Team reconvene every 90 days to review progress and discuss new goals and interventions. It is expected that at the first quarterly Treatment Plan Review Meeting (four months after intake), the team will already have noted trends that indicate the likelihood of achieving the 6-month discharge target. An Individualized Service Plan Report (ISPR) is generated with progress update and new goals and objectives.

Back